Out of Our Own Complexity

Complexity is automatically difficult to discuss because something truly complex is murkily understood, therefore impossible to precisely define. Yogi Berra nailed complexity: “If I understand it, it’s simple; if I don’t, it’s complicated.” Lost and Confused Signpost

Something intricate, like a fancy mechanical watch, may not be very complex. If we apply our minds to the mechanism for a while, we’ll figure out how it works.

A really complex system may have a lot of influences on it that we are unaware of and feedback loops that are not straightforward. A complex system is always changing, not static. In addition, we wallow in complexity of our own making because we are often embedded in that system, and humans are packages of logic and emotion so complicated that as individuals we may consult a psychologist to help us figure out how we work. That is, our own understanding of a complex system chases a moving target that eludes precise definition.

Introducing some non-standard definitions may help to start knifing through this:

Heuristics: Search logics for problem solving. The tools of lean and quality are heuristics that assume that we have a common definition for waste. In turn, that assumes a common understanding of a company’s purpose, and a common understanding of customer needs; therefore, how to serve them well. Before we can effectively use heuristics, much of the complexity must melt away. In a vigorous learning organization, leadership must guide people in melting this mush and align them with a common mission and language.

Perspectives: Mental or symbolic maps of a system being considered; how it works, and what influences it. A mental map that is only symbolized mentally leads to intuitive problem resolutions (can’t explain them). For groups to resolve problems, a common problem language is necessary to explain problems and to record actions taken (as with A3 in the lean system).

Heuristic “tools” help create a common language, but they do not help to reconcile or take advantage of different perspectives. If members can “get along,” team problem solving takes advantage of diverse perspectives to be more effective when members with different perspectives on a problem generate more ideas and more imaginative ones.

But alas, reconciling adamantly different perspectives is a huge matter in resolving problems that are truly wicked for that reason. The perspectives of a subdivision developer and an ecological reviewer of his or her plan are apt to be in dramatic opposition. People defending interests may speak the same language without ever hearing the same language. If their perspectives harden into concrete, they may not even agree that a problem exists, or if they do, never agree on a definition for it. Problem resolution evaporates in a big cloud of distrust.

From a local to a global level, escaping the distrust of non-reconciling perspectives is the human issue of our times. Variants on systems thinking as well as various kinds of peacemaking mediators have been struggling with this for years, but successes make duller news than flame-spitting conflicts. Future updates will cover this also.

Tractable Problem Scope: A problem is tractable if we can deal with it. We can deal personally with small problems within our control (repair the back door). We can deal collectively with common problems within shared control (set up a schedule for volunteer school crossing guards). We can’t deal with big abstract problems like global hunger. The Compression Institute seeks problem areas of tractable scope, small enough to execute significant change, but big enough to have significant influence on all of us learning to do better using much less.

Vigorous Learning: Vigorous learning is a collective, but not a kumbayah process. When the issues involve differing interests and perspectives, we have to migrate the diversity of perspective from a set of win-lose obstacles into a divergence of perspectives as an asset seeing a problem from a view that may emerge as new to all participants. Said differently, can we grow from seeing opposing issues into seeing common problems?

Over time, a vigorous learning organization should develop both great heuristic learning and great methods for combining perspectives. And that topic too, we will take up again.

Recent Posts:

The Influence of Neoliberalism Runs Deep

The Influence of Neoliberalism Runs Deep Better known in the United States as Libertarianism, neoliberal dogma began as simplistic assumptions in old quantitative economic models, before computers; later economists were not as constrained. Moneyed people glommed onto...

“Deep” Complexity

A graphic depiction of Gaia from Pixabay, showing that we are connected to each other, to our ecology, and to everything else. That everything in the entire universe, not just earth bound systems, all somehow link together.   Can We Understand Complexity or Only...

Covid-19 Complexity

This is one variation of Ouroboros, a snake eating its own tail -- doesn't recognize its own tail.. Here Ouroboros is also shown in the form of the universal symbol for infinity, signifying deep, hidden feedback connections that we might never be able to fathom with...

A Microbiomic Crisis

The Economy Critically Disrupts the Balance of Nature  Black Lives Matter demonstrations all over the world crowded Covid-19 out of the news, swelling into a pandemic of demonstrations in small towns as well as big cities on six continents. Triggered by the death of...

Planet of the Humans

Planet of the Humans, movie by Michael Moore and Jeff Gibbs Moore and Gibbs’ movie appears calculated to incite controversy. If so, they certainly roiled the environmental community. So far, it’s received little mainstream attention, and a few environmental activists...

Finding Our Real Reserves

Finding Our Real Reserves April 7, 2020  Covid-19 and its economic tailspin presage many more crises to come. We must change how we live and how we think. Our economic objectives have set us up for Covid-19, with more debacles on the way. What we have assumed to...

System Fragility

Above: Model of the Corona Virus. At Right: Diagram of our proper priorities: Earth first; us second; profit third. Or, should profit be no more than a systemic convention? Collapse Now and Avoid the Rush First in a Series “Collapse Now and Avoid the Rush” is a stock...

Legal Creep

  Legal Creep Or why we think there is no alternative to economic expansion A better sub-title for this essay with two book reviews might be “can we escape our self-deception that economic expansion is necessary?” Whether economic expansion is labeled capitalist...

Follow Us: