The Quality of Life Conundrum

Compression and discussion about what makes quality of lifeJuly 14, 2011

When talking up Compression Thinking at the Lean Enterprise Research Center in Cardiff, Wales, one set of questions there differed from discussions in the United States: what is implied by “quality of life?”

Compression Thinking hinges together two opposing ideas:

  1. Since we do not have an infinite supply of natural resources, our historical pattern of accelerating industrial development cannot long continue. That’s a hypothesis. Some interlocking evidence supports it. Conclusion: our use of natural resources needs to decline, not increase, but human population is increasing.
  2. Despite this, we think that we should enable everyone on earth to have a reasonable “quality of life.” That’s a values statement of the right thing to do.

Reconciling this conflict sets up discussing quality of life, a subjective concept. Each of us has our own preferences, which are apt to be buried in unquestioned assumptions. Personal quality of life opens topics from shopping mania to seeing doctors. Few of us crave to live like the guy in the photo above, whether he fell into that state by his own doing, or by someone else’s. At the same time, one hears of profligate consumers who don newly bought clothes each day rather than do laundry.

At a minimum, quality of life is fed, clothed, warmed, sheltered, and healthy; but it is more than that. In organizations from the UN to The Economist, various quality of life indices include factors from equality of justice to a popsicle index (the % of people who think that a child can safely walk the streets to buy a popsicle). Only one factor in a list of a dozen or so may relate to wealth or spending, and some surveys probe fuzzy concepts like happiness, wellbeing, and life satisfaction.

Severe deprivation clearly reduces quality of life, but once basics are met, extra consumption is foggily related to it. However, if someone insists that a private jet with a built-in Jacuzzi is essential to her quality of life, and can afford it, can’t she have it?

That’s the conundrum. Technology has only begun to let us make much more effective use of a limited stock of resources, but flagrant use of them has to become a violation of social norms. That’s a huge change in belief from regarding conspicuous consumption as a status symbol. Many of us have an innate urge to embellish our persona with distinctive bling, but in societies with limited resources, these quirks may symbolize personal restraint rather than extravagance. Promotion of social recognition does not have to squander resources.

This conundrum extends to companies and the commercial system for evaluating success. It’s also a huge shift from regarding more as better to helping your customers have better outcomes while using much less. That’s quality over quantity, always.

We’ve barely begun to make an emotional shift of this magnitude.

Recent Posts:

The Influence of Neoliberalism Runs Deep

The Influence of Neoliberalism Runs Deep Better known in the United States as Libertarianism, neoliberal dogma began as simplistic assumptions in old quantitative economic models, before computers; later economists were not as constrained. Moneyed people glommed onto...

“Deep” Complexity

A graphic depiction of Gaia from Pixabay, showing that we are connected to each other, to our ecology, and to everything else. That everything in the entire universe, not just earth bound systems, all somehow link together.   Can We Understand Complexity or Only...

Covid-19 Complexity

This is one variation of Ouroboros, a snake eating its own tail -- doesn't recognize its own tail.. Here Ouroboros is also shown in the form of the universal symbol for infinity, signifying deep, hidden feedback connections that we might never be able to fathom with...

A Microbiomic Crisis

The Economy Critically Disrupts the Balance of Nature  Black Lives Matter demonstrations all over the world crowded Covid-19 out of the news, swelling into a pandemic of demonstrations in small towns as well as big cities on six continents. Triggered by the death of...

Planet of the Humans

Planet of the Humans, movie by Michael Moore and Jeff Gibbs Moore and Gibbs’ movie appears calculated to incite controversy. If so, they certainly roiled the environmental community. So far, it’s received little mainstream attention, and a few environmental activists...

Finding Our Real Reserves

Finding Our Real Reserves April 7, 2020  Covid-19 and its economic tailspin presage many more crises to come. We must change how we live and how we think. Our economic objectives have set us up for Covid-19, with more debacles on the way. What we have assumed to...

System Fragility

Above: Model of the Corona Virus. At Right: Diagram of our proper priorities: Earth first; us second; profit third. Or, should profit be no more than a systemic convention? Collapse Now and Avoid the Rush First in a Series “Collapse Now and Avoid the Rush” is a stock...

Legal Creep

  Legal Creep Or why we think there is no alternative to economic expansion A better sub-title for this essay with two book reviews might be “can we escape our self-deception that economic expansion is necessary?” Whether economic expansion is labeled capitalist...

Follow Us: